Discussion about this post

User's avatar
detribulated's avatar

comment unrelated, except for poetry

So what's your criticism of the apparently cringe poem circulating on twitter now?

(Would have asked there–but I don't have an acc and use nitter, so)

Most criticisms of it are either just castigating it for seeming like "prose w/ line breaks" or w/e or castrating it for genre

So either ignoring the fact that

lineation is a technique for creating rhythm

and reordering context, and so on—

poetry *can* be created from

cutting chopping fucking up spindle fold and mutilating

prose and source texts—

or failing to aesthetically evaluate the piece within the genre it fully occupies

which seems the fairest and most faithful approach

(the genre itself may be mid, but for gender's sake, does that really matter?)

in the absence of a better example of the author's other work and being bereft

of an exegesis of the exact aesthetic values the author desired to exhume for the piece.

The most interesting reason to criticise it would be not the incessant chatting about

objective aesthetics and how the poem obstructs itself from those flatland heights

but to tell us about the critic’s aesthetics and tell us what they would have done

were they writing a confessional poem about sex and dinner

like ironicising the confessional I

commenting on its artificiality

examining how its reduction of real relationships

to mere poetic material

is taking a second bite of the cherry, chasing that moment by

unfolding it lines and splaying on paper like a Lepidoptera of love

under the gaze of the poet-naturalist, glancing at the world

and describing it "as it is". Dream on, larks of love in. side out.

No posts

Ready for more?